Meningkatkan Mutu Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Analisis Soal Pilihan Ganda Bahasa Arab

Andini Nuraisyah

doi:10.35931/am.v7i2.3353

Meningkatkan Mutu Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Analisis Soal Pilihan Ganda Bahasa Arab

Andini Nuraisyah

Abstract

Learning evaluation is one part of the learning process. Through evaluation, a teacher can find out students' abilities and understanding of the material they have studied. Evaluation instruments require quality tests or questions in terms of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing power and effectiveness of distractors. Question items prepared by a teacher to test students' abilities must be recommended to be tested for suitability based on these aspects so that the instruments that have been prepared can be used according to their function. This research was conducted using a descriptive methodology and quantitative research form. The research instrument used was 15 grade 5 PAS Arabic multiple choice questions and the research subjects were 5th grade students at SDIT Al Inayah for the 2023-2024 academic year who were tested by 37 participants. The results of the analysis of the questions in this study in the validity aspect were still not good because only 3 questions (20%) were valid. Then, in terms of the level of difficulty, it is sufficient but not yet balanced because no difficult questions were found. From the aspect of discriminating power, the questions studied were quite good and produced a discriminating power of each question which was 40% and good, reaching 33%. The effectiveness of the distractors in this study was also sufficient because 25% of the distractors were found to be functional, and 25% were rejected. Thus, from the results of this analysis, a teacher can improve and develop question items that are still not good in some of these aspects.

Keywords

Question analysis, evaluation instrument, multiple choice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, H., & Auliya, A. N. (2024). Analisis Soal Tes Kompetemsi Kebahasaan Pada Penilaian Tengah Semester Bahasa Arab Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Al Mi’yar, 7(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.35931/ am.v7i1. 3157

Akhmadi, M. N. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Evaluasi Tema 1 Kelas 4 SDN Plumbungan. Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.33752/ed-humanistics.v6i1.1464

Alwi, I. (2012). Kriteria Empirik Dalam Menentukan Ukuran Sampel Pada Pengujian Hipotesis Statistika Dan Analisis Butir. Jurnal Formatif, 2(2), 140–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v2i2.95

Antari, B., Susanta, A., & Siagian T.A. (n.d.). Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Matematika SMA Negeri 8 Kota Bengkulu Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 9(2), 299–312.

Cantabrana, J. L. L., Rodriguez, M. U., & Cervera, M. G. (2019). Assessing Teacher Digital Competence: The Construction of an Instrument for Measuring the Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.370

Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning Environments, 10(12), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00231-3

Gunawan, A. A., & Sunardi, HP. (2016). Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT Gesit Nusa Tangguh. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis, 16(1), 1–12.

Khasanah, I., Fuady, A., & Sunismi. (2023). Analisis Soal Ulangan Harian Matematika Bentuk Pilihan Ganda. Mathema Journal, 5(2), 110–125.

Lumbantobing, L. R. (n.d.). Kelebihan dan Keterbatasan Dari Bentuk-Bentuk Penilaian Tes Tertulis. Pusdiklat Keuangan Umum.

Matsna, Moh., & Mahyudin, E. (2014). Pengembangan Evaluasi dan Tes Bahasa Arab. Alkitabah.

N, S. (2019). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho, M. A. (2016). Studi Analisis Butir Soal Latihan Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Arabia, 8(2), 215–238.

Nurhalimah, S., Hidayati, Y., Rosidi, I., & Hadi, W. P. (2022). Hubungan antara Validitas Item Dengan Daya Pembeda Dan Tingkat Kesukaran Soal Pilihan Ganda PAS. Jurnal Natural Science Education Research, 4(3), 249–257.

Retnawati, H. (n.d.). Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian. Retrieved January 30, 2023, from https://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132255129/pengabdian/8%20Reliabilitas3%20alhamdulillah.pdf

Roman-Gonzalez, M., Moreno-Leon, J., & Robles, G. (2019). Combining Assessment Tools for a Comprehensive Evaluation of Computational Thinking Interventions. Springer Open.

Sa’idah, N., Yulistiana, H. D., & Megawati, E. (2019). Analisis Instrumen Tes Higher Order Thinking Matematika SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 41–54.

Saputra, H. D., Purwanto, W., Setiawan, D., Fernandez, D., & Putra, R. (2022). Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa: Analisis Butir Soal Tes. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 20(1), 15–27.

Sari, L. M. (2018). Evaluasi Dalam Pendidikan Islam. Al-Tadzkiyyah : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 211–231.

Sayuti, M. (2023). Pengembangan Penilaian HOTS dalam Pembellajaran Maharah Istima’ Pada Buku Bahasa Arab MI Kelas VI Kementerian Agama RI. Al Mi’yar, 6(2), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.35931/ am.v6i2. 2646

Solichin, M. (2017). Analisis Daya Beda Soal, Taraf Kesukaran, Validitas Butir Tes, Interpretasi Hasil Tes dan Validitas Ramalan Dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan. Dirasat : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.26594/dirasat.v2i2.879

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suseno, E., & Susongko, P. (2021). Mengukur Validitas Tes (1st ed.). Pameral Edukreatif.

Susilawati, D. (2018). Tes dan Pengukuran. UPI Sumedang Press.

Wartoni, & Benyamin, P. I. (2020). Strategi Pengembangan Tes Objektif (Pilihan Ganda). Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 5(1), 1–8.

Wisman, Y. (2021). Penerapan Konsep Instrumen Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 12(1), 1–9.

Zain, A. H. N., Fauzy, A. N., & Hermawan, A. (2024). Analisis Ketermpilan Bersastra dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Al Mi’yar, 7(1), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.35931/ am.v7i1. 3195

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i2.3353